# Feature Request, ST-60 Display information of the MQA unfold status on digital inputs **URL:** \ **Category:** Features\ **Tags:** firmware, request\ **Created:** [July 2, 2021, 12:29pm UTC](https://arcam.discourse.group/t/feature-request-st-60-display-information-of-the-mqa-unfold-status-on-digital-inputs/549 "2021-07-02T12:29:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![XpanderXXL](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/22d042/32.png) [@XpanderXXL](https://arcam.discourse.group/u/XpanderXXL)\ **Post date:** [July 2, 2021, 12:29pm UTC](https://arcam.discourse.group/t/feature-request-st-60-display-information-of-the-mqa-unfold-status-on-digital-inputs/549/1 "2021-07-02T12:29:12Z")
# Short description of the requested feature It would be nice to have some kind of information on the ST-60 display when fed from the digital inputs, whether the incoming data is detected as MQA, the level of unfolding performed, input sample rate/bit depth output sample rate / bit depth, and provenance information ## How could that work? 1: Tidal streaming MQA FLAC through a computer on Input 1 (passthrough MQA) 2: ST60 display showing not only the input selected, but the level of unfolding performed, input sample rate/bit depth output sample rate / bit depth, and provenance information Display suggested layout Digital 1 MQA (provenance) unfold state 2: 44/24 --\>192/24 3: Provenance may be just MQA or MQA studio ## User community interest Would you be interested in such feature? Please reply to the poll. _Poll ([view on site](https://arcam.discourse.group/t/feature-request-st-60-display-information-of-the-mqa-unfold-status-on-digital-inputs/549/1))_ ---
**Author:** ![jvs1](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/arcam.discourse.group/jvs1/32/10_2.png) [@jvs1](https://arcam.discourse.group/u/jvs1)\ **Post date:** [July 2, 2021, 12:48pm UTC](https://arcam.discourse.group/t/feature-request-st-60-display-information-of-the-mqa-unfold-status-on-digital-inputs/549/2 "2021-07-02T12:48:43Z")
Hi Jose, thank you for posting the first ST60 feature request on the SA30 forum 🙂 I enabled the poll for you. Lets see how many ST60 enthusiasts we have here 😉 ---
**Author:** ![XpanderXXL](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/22d042/32.png) [@XpanderXXL](https://arcam.discourse.group/u/XpanderXXL)\ **Post date:** [July 2, 2021, 5:45pm UTC](https://arcam.discourse.group/t/feature-request-st-60-display-information-of-the-mqa-unfold-status-on-digital-inputs/549/3 "2021-07-02T17:45:26Z")
Oops! Sorry, I was a little confused. But it is a neat feature for both devices and their firmware seem to be from similar source code… ---
**Author:** ![LuckyLuke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/53a042/32.png) [@LuckyLuke](https://arcam.discourse.group/u/LuckyLuke)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2021, 4:12pm UTC](https://arcam.discourse.group/t/feature-request-st-60-display-information-of-the-mqa-unfold-status-on-digital-inputs/549/4 "2021-07-06T16:12:49Z")
One feature I would love to see for the SA30 is to be able to rename input sources… Is this a possibility for the future maybe? ---
**Author:** ![madfiddler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a8b319/32.png) [@madfiddler](https://arcam.discourse.group/u/madfiddler)\ **Post date:** [July 6, 2021, 6:33pm UTC](https://arcam.discourse.group/t/feature-request-st-60-display-information-of-the-mqa-unfold-status-on-digital-inputs/549/5 "2021-07-06T18:33:26Z")
@LuckyLuke You probably want to create a new thread for this as a feature request. I would second this by the way. Bugs me that a CD player via analogue is labelled CD but if you connect digitally it won’t be. Having said that you can’t change the labels on the remote 🤷🏻‍♂️ ---
**Author:** ![LuckyLuke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/53a042/32.png) [@LuckyLuke](https://arcam.discourse.group/u/LuckyLuke)\ **Post date:** [July 7, 2021, 8:03am UTC](https://arcam.discourse.group/t/feature-request-st-60-display-information-of-the-mqa-unfold-status-on-digital-inputs/549/6 "2021-07-07T08:03:14Z")
Hi madfiddler, Taken up your suggestion in the hope it gets people to thin about adding the feature option. Thx